All About Kimberly

Sailing Along the Life of Single Parenthood

Dang Copyright!

Ugh! I uploaded a large set of pictures online at the end of last week and had them sent to my local Wal-mart for printing.  This was A LOT of pictures as I wanted to start replacing pictures that my grandparents lost in their housefire last week.  I was really quite proud of myself for thinking to do this and for acting so quickly.  However, I ended up leaving Wal-Mart quite unhappy.  I did get most of my photos, but they would not give me a handful of them (maybe 6 out of the 100).

And yes, I’m educated, and I do understand their reasoning, but I don’t like it. You see these were wedding pictures of my grandparents, and therefore, Wal-Mart pointed out that they were copyrighted because they were in fact wedding photography. That’s normally all fine and dandy, but I have two problems. First of all they were married in New York so how I would I ever even begin locate the photographer, and second, I probably couldn’t locate him because they were married 40+ years ago. Yes, I understand copyright. I know it’s intention, and I respect it, but I think maybe it’s time for laws to be changed.  Finding a New York wedding photographer from over forty years ago (especially since we live in Texas) is nearly impossible. Second even if I could locate him, I can almost guarantee that he would not still have these negatives and therefore, me printing these elsewhere is not costing him any money. Very few photographers would still have picture negatives after this long (heck! I’ve actually called for some old photos from Sears before to be told they were LONG destroyed, but they still would not sign over permission for me to copy them, but that’s an entirely different story.)

Another thing that really frustrates me about all this is that apparently the person who made the decision to pull out these photos is a complete moron. There were at least 10 to 12 more professional in-studio pictures (or school pictures) in this set that they did not pull out.  So it appears that they really have no idea what pictures are protected and which are not. They were just making arbitrary, uneducation decisions that are keeping my grandparents from restoring visual memories of their life together.  So what am I doing about it? Well first of all, not that it will do anything but make me feel better, but we will not be doing any shopping at Wal-Mart for a long time (I haven’t shopped at Beall’s Department Store in 6 years after I had a run-in with them). I’ve also submitted these same pictures to an online photo printer and ordered them. I’m crossing my fingers that they won’t question the pictures. We shall see.

Use Buzzfuse* to easily rate, review, and share this item

Category: Personal
  • Hedy says:

    How nice of you to do that for your grandparents! I’ve heard of that happening with people’s Photopass pictures at WalMart, so I think it may be a company-wide thing.

    May 21, 2008 at 10:11 pm
  • Kimberly says:

    Thanks. They didn’t do stop any of my Photopass Pictures thank goodness. Just SOME of the obvious studio type pictures. What made me the angriest I think was the inconsistency of only choosing a few of them randomly.

    May 21, 2008 at 10:22 pm
  • Catherine says:

    Ugh I feel your pain. Try bringing them to Walgreens or Kinkos. I’ve had luck at both places when trying to copy those types of photos.

    May 23, 2008 at 10:42 am
  • cindy says:

    I am sorry that you had trouble with the photo center in your Walmart. The policy is thanks to Disney. The policy was changed from 50 years to forever becuse of them.

    June 24, 2008 at 11:04 pm
  • Kimberly says:

    That figures…the company I love causing me such grief…about my luck!

    June 24, 2008 at 11:07 pm

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

CommentLuv badge